Exercise training in older patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction: a randomized, controlled, single-blind trial

DW Kitzman, PH Brubaker, TM Morgan… - Circulation: Heart …, 2010 - Am Heart Assoc
DW Kitzman, PH Brubaker, TM Morgan, KP Stewart, WC Little
Circulation: Heart Failure, 2010Am Heart Assoc
Background—Heart failure (HF) with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (HFPEF) is
the most common form of HF in the older population. Exercise intolerance is the primary
chronic symptom in patients with HFPEF and is a strong determinant of their reduced quality
of life (QOL). Exercise training (ET) improves exercise intolerance and QOL in patients with
HF with reduced ejection fraction (EF). However, the effect of ET in HFPEF has not been
examined in a randomized controlled trial. Methods and Results—This 16-week …
Background
Heart failure (HF) with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (HFPEF) is the most common form of HF in the older population. Exercise intolerance is the primary chronic symptom in patients with HFPEF and is a strong determinant of their reduced quality of life (QOL). Exercise training (ET) improves exercise intolerance and QOL in patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (EF). However, the effect of ET in HFPEF has not been examined in a randomized controlled trial.
Methods and Results
This 16-week investigation was a randomized, attention-controlled, single-blind study of medically supervised ET (3 days per week) on exercise intolerance and QOL in 53 elderly patients (mean age, 70±6 years; range, 60 to 82 years; women, 46) with isolated HFPEF (EF ≥50% and no significant coronary, valvular, or pulmonary disease). Attention controls received biweekly follow-up telephone calls. Forty-six patients completed the study (24 ET, 22 controls). Attendance at exercise sessions in the ET group was excellent (88%; range, 64% to 100%). There were no trial-related adverse events. The primary outcome of peak exercise oxygen uptake increased significantly in the ET group compared to the control group (13.8±2.5 to 16.1±2.6 mL/kg per minute [change, 2.3±2.2 mL/kg per minute] versus 12.8±2.6 to 12.5±3.4 mL/kg per minute [change, −0.3±2.1 mL/kg per minute]; P=0.0002). There were significant improvements in peak power output, exercise time, 6-minute walk distance, and ventilatory anaerobic threshold (all P<0.002). There was improvement in the physical QOL score (P=0.03) but not in the total score (P=0.11).
Conclusions
ET improves peak and submaximal exercise capacity in older patients with HFPEF.
Clinical Trial Registration
URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01113840.
Am Heart Assoc