[HTML][HTML] Using multivariable Mendelian randomization to disentangle the causal effects of lipid fractions

S Burgess, DF Freitag, H Khan, DN Gorman… - PloS one, 2014 - journals.plos.org
S Burgess, DF Freitag, H Khan, DN Gorman, SG Thompson
PloS one, 2014journals.plos.org
Background Previous Mendelian randomization studies have suggested that, while low-
density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c) and triglycerides are causally implicated in coronary
artery disease (CAD) risk, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-c) may not be, with
causal effect estimates compatible with the null. Principal Findings The causal effects of
these three lipid fractions can be better identified using the extended methods of
'multivariable Mendelian randomization'. We employ this approach using published data on …
Background
Previous Mendelian randomization studies have suggested that, while low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c) and triglycerides are causally implicated in coronary artery disease (CAD) risk, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-c) may not be, with causal effect estimates compatible with the null.
Principal Findings
The causal effects of these three lipid fractions can be better identified using the extended methods of ‘multivariable Mendelian randomization’. We employ this approach using published data on 185 lipid-related genetic variants and their associations with lipid fractions in 188,578 participants, and with CAD risk in 22,233 cases and 64,762 controls. Our results suggest that HDL-c may be causally protective of CAD risk, independently of the effects of LDL-c and triglycerides. Estimated causal odds ratios per standard deviation increase, based on 162 variants not having pleiotropic associations with either blood pressure or body mass index, are 1.57 (95% credible interval 1.45 to 1.70) for LDL-c, 0.91 (0.83 to 0.99, p-value  = 0.028) for HDL-c, and 1.29 (1.16 to 1.43) for triglycerides.
Significance
Some interventions on HDL-c concentrations may influence risk of CAD, but to a lesser extent than interventions on LDL-c. A causal interpretation of these estimates relies on the assumption that the genetic variants do not have pleiotropic associations with risk factors on other pathways to CAD. If they do, a weaker conclusion is that genetic predictors of LDL-c, HDL-c and triglycerides each have independent associations with CAD risk.
PLOS