A comparison between the minimal model and the glucose clamp in the assessment of insulin sensitivity across the spectrum of glucose tolerance

MF Saad, RL Anderson, A Laws, RM Watanabe… - Diabetes, 1994 - Am Diabetes Assoc
MF Saad, RL Anderson, A Laws, RM Watanabe, WW Kades, YDI Chen, RE Sands, D Pei…
Diabetes, 1994Am Diabetes Assoc
An insulin-modified frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test (FSIGTT) with
minimal model analysis was compared with the glucose clamp in 11 subjects with normal
glucose tolerance (NGT), 20 with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), and 24 with non-insulin-
dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM). The insulin sensitivity index (SI) was calculated from
FSIGTT using 22-and 12-sample protocols (SI (22) and SI (12), respectively). Insulin
sensitivity from the clamp was expressed as SI (clamp) and SIP (clamp). Minimal model …
An insulin-modified frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test (FSIGTT) with minimal model analysis was compared with the glucose clamp in 11 subjects with normal glucose tolerance (NGT), 20 with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), and 24 with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM). The insulin sensitivity index (SI) was calculated from FSIGTT using 22- and 12-sample protocols (SI(22) and SI(12), respectively). Insulin sensitivity from the clamp was expressed as SI(clamp) and SIP(clamp). Minimal model parameters were similar when calculated with SI(22) and SI(12). SI could not be distinguished from 0 in ∼ 50% of diabetic patients with either protocol. SI(22) correlated significantly with SI(clamp) in the whole group (r = 0.62), and in the NGT (r = 0.53), IGT (r = 0.48), and NIDDM (r = 0.41) groups (P < 0.05 for each). SI(12) correlated significantly with SI(clamp) in the whole group (r = 0.55, P < 0.001) and in the NGT (r = 0.53, P = 0.046) and IGT (r = 0.58, P = 0.008) but not NIDDM (r = 0.30, P = 0.085) groups. When SI(22), SI(clamp), and SIP(clamp) were expressed in the same units, SI(22) was 66 ± 5% (mean ± SE) and 50 ± 8% lower than SI(clamp) and SIP(clamp), respectively. Thus, minimal model analysis of the insulin-modified FSIGTT provides estimates of insulin sensitivity that correlate significantly with those from the glucose clamp. The correlation was weaker, however, in NIDDM. The insulin-modified FSIGTT can be used as a simple test for assessment of insulin sensitivity in population studies involving nondiabetic subjects. Additional studies are needed before using this test routinely in patients with NIDDM.
Am Diabetes Assoc